New Benghazi attack reports all take different approaches to situation


If anyone is interested, read all these regarding the Benghazi attacks, it’s suspicious how each site approaches the situation differently even though journalists aren’t supposed to jump to conclusions…..

http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/post/benghazi-timeline-challenges-fox-news-story/2012/11/02/07e6ab0e-2487-11e2-ac85-e669876c6a24_blog.html

-this article defends the CIA’s action and disproves FOX news’ negative claims against a “stand down” order

http://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/david-ignatius-cias-benghazi-timeline-reveals-errors-but-no-evidence-of-conspiracy/2012/11/01/a84c4024-2471-11e2-9313-3c7f59038d93_story.html

-same general idea, is the WP pulling for the CIA?

http://online.wsj.com/article/SB10000872396390444620104578008922056244096.html

-a timeline of events focused on the attack-period only
-a more detailed timeline of events by the WP
-this focuses on the denial of “stand-down” claims by a US intelligence official
-this defends CIA’s action as well
Advertisements

Leave a comment

Filed under Journalism, News, Opinion

Start an argument here!

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s